$20 Million Closer to a Clean & Healthy Bay

Just after Labor Day, we asked you to join Save The Bay in the fight to secure additional funding for important Bay restoration projects in the Parks and Water Bond under consideration by the State Legislature. You responded with overwhelming support. Over 1,700 of you signed our petition that we delivered to key members of the Bay Area Legislative Caucus.

With that support, and the help of our allies from the Bay Area Council, the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, Operating Engineers Local 3, and the Governing Board of the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority, we worked hard to make our case for Bay restoration funding among competing environmental priorities throughout California.

While we are disappointed that the final Parks and Water Bond the Legislature approved does not include the level of funding we had hoped for, we are happy to report that it does include a one-time state investment of $20 million for San Francisco Bay restoration projects. Subject to the Governor’s signature and voter approval on the June 2018 statewide ballot, these funds would add to the $25 million annually for 20 years provided by 2016’s regional Measure AA.

We have already begun work to identify additional Bay funding options that we can pursue in the coming year, and as always, our success will rely on your efforts.

Thank you for your ongoing support of our beautiful Bay,

David Lewis
Executive Director, Save The Bay

Bay restoration on the ballot

From L-R: Save The Bay Executive Director David Lewis; State Assemblymember Sally Lieber, Ret.; Mountain View Mayor Pat Showalter; San Mateo County Supervisor and Bay Restoration Authority Governing Board Chair Dave Pine; State Coastal Conservancy Executive Officer Sam Schuchat; and Coastal Conservancy Deputy Executive Officer Amy Hutzel.

Great news! Thanks to a groundswell of support, Bay Area voters will now have a chance to vote for a Clean and Healthy Bay this June.

In a nutshell, the Clean and Healthy Bay measure proposes a modest $12 parcel tax that would help fund much needed large scale wetland restoration projects around San Francisco Bay. If passed, this ballot measure would:

  • Make the Bay healthier for wildlife
  • Protect shoreline communities and vital infrastructure
  • Improve Bay water quality
  • Increase public access to trails and recreation

Living in the Bay Area comes with a great responsibility to protect San Francisco Bay itself. The Bay has long been central to our identity as a region and helps drive our region’s economic and social wealth.  Thanks to the Bay Restoration Authority we have a real shot at realizing this vision for a healthy Bay.

Passing this measure is no easy feat and success is far from certain. We’re going to need your help from now until June to support this critical piece of legislation.

This is the greatest opportunity in a generation to restore our Bay for people, wildlife, and our economy. Are you in?

Saving the Bay: From Rescue to Restoration


What’s that stinky creek out there,
Down behind the slum’s back stair,
Sludgy puddle, sad and gray?
Why man, that’s San Francisco Bay!
– “Seventy Miles” by Malvina Reynolds and Pete Seeger, 1965

Take Action Now
Looking out on the majestic beauty of San Francisco Bay in 2015, it’s hard for many younger and newer residents of the Bay Area to believe that just fifty years ago, Malvina Reynolds and Pete Seeger were shocked enough by its condition that they memorialized it in song as a “Sludgy puddle, sad and gray.”

Yet, it’s true – half a century ago, the Bay was choked with raw sewage and industrial pollution, and plans were to fill in 60 percent of its remaining area, leaving only a narrow shipping channel in its place.

Fortunately, in 1961, Save The Bay’s founders set out to rescue the Bay from destruction, and helped give birth to our nation’s grassroots environmental movement. Mobilizing thousands of Bay Area residents into action over the course of the decade, these three remarkable women led landmark victories including a moratorium on Bay fill, the closure of more than 30 shoreline garbage dumps, an end to the release of raw sewage, and establishment of the Bay Conservation and Development Commission to regulate shoreline development and increase public access to the Bay.

For 55 years, Save The Bay has been occupied primarily with successive versions of our founders’ initial mission to protect the Bay from damaging shoreline development. Along with dedicated local groups, we’ve defeated numerous, hugely destructive plans including: the Santa Fe Railroad Company’s Bay fill scheme to build Berkeley three miles out into the water; David Rockefeller’s surreal fantasy of building a new Manhattan in the Bay with fill from chopping off the top of San Bruno mountain; Mobil Oil’s blueprint for massive development on Bair Island; and SFO’s ill-conceived effort to pave the Bay for runway expansions.

Now, with Cargill’s Redwood City Saltworks proposal on the ropes, and plans to develop Newark Area 4 likely to be rejected by BCDC and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, these last threats to the largest remaining tracts of unprotected, restorable Bay wetlands may soon be overcome.

The next phase of saving the Bay

The first phase of our organization’s history, focused on rescuing the Bay, is now drawing to a close; the next phase of our history, focused on restoring the Bay to full health, is beginning in earnest; and the scale of our challenges and the importance of our work are as enormous as they have ever been.

While Bay restoration has always been integral to Save The Bay’s mission, only now, after many years’ effort, do we have a real opportunity to achieve it on scale and realize our founders’ ultimate vision.

In 1999, a consortium of estuary scientists published the Baylands Ecosystem Habitat Goals, which established that San Francisco Bay needed 100,000 acres of wetlands to restore and sustain its health. At the time, less than 40,000 acres of Bay wetlands remained, but thanks to the efforts of Save The Bay’s many partners, a similar number of restorable acres had been protected from any further development. Local efforts have managed to restore 5,000 acres of wetlands since then, but the vast majority of protected Bay wetlands are still awaiting restoration.

The biggest challenge has been the lack of sufficient, reliable funding to pursue large scale restoration. With scant annual federal funding – on the order of $5 million per year – and state support limited to one-time injections of bond funds, the price tag of $1.43 billion to restore the acres under protection has been too steep, and efforts to secure additional funding from existing sources have yielded little.

Faced with the quandary of having thousands of acres of restorable wetlands under public ownership without an appropriate source of funds to restore them, Save The Bay moved to change the equation.

Funding Bay restoration on scale

In 2007, we published Greening the Bay, a strategy for financing Bay restoration by establishing a regional special district that would allow the Bay Area to raise the local share of wetlands restoration costs, which could be used to leverage increased state and federal funding to cover the remainder.

That publication and the organizing around it led directly to creation of the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority, a regional public agency charged with raising the local funds and managing the grants necessary to implement the many restoration projects in the pipeline and begin the long overdue work of restoring the Bay’s wetlands.

Unfortunately, at its very start, the Authority was stalled out by the stark reality of the Great Recession. In the grips of that extraordinary economic downturn, the same Bay Area voters who had consistently and overwhelmingly supported the goal of improving the Bay for both people and wildlife proved unwilling to pay even a small amount in additional taxes to fund the local share of restoration efforts.

Today, the Authority is preparing to propose a small parcel tax to voters in all nine Bay Area counties, to enhance our environment and strengthen our economy at the same time.

  • The June 2016 ballot measure would generate $500 million in new funding for projects to restore thousands of acres of tidal marsh, making the Bay healthier for fish, birds, seals and other threatened marine life. Parcels would be assessed $12 each year for 20 years.
  • The funding would accelerate projects that prevent flooding of residential communities and economic infrastructure, reduce pollution in the Bay, and improve trails for public
  • An April 2015 survey found that a supermajority of Bay Area voters will make an investment to ensure the Bay is clean and healthy. After hearing arguments for and against, 70% would vote in favor of a $12 parcel tax to improve the Bay – more than the 2/3 necessary for passage.

A recent op-ed in the San Jose Mercury News by Save The Bay’s Executive Director, David Lewis, and prominent business leader Andy Ball made the case and the call: Act now to protect San Francisco Bay!

We can make this breakthrough, and restore San Francisco Bay for all the generations to come, but only if Save The Bay’s supporters lead the way, as we have throughout our organization’s history.

We know our supporters are up to the challenge, and in the weeks ahead we’ll be letting you know exactly what you can do to help. Thank you, as always, for all you do to Save The Bay!

Meeting the Challenge of Sea Level Rise

Too often, we let big and complicated (or just plain uncomfortable) issues linger until it’s too late to change.  Call it what you will – the urge to act like an ostrich and stick your head in the sand rather than deal with problems head-on is something innate in each of us.

Threats to our shoreline communities vary dramatically throughout the region.
Threats to our shoreline communities vary dramatically throughout the region.

And that’s part of why it was so refreshing to see over 400 individuals, agency staffers, local elected officials and scientists come together earlier this week for a wide-ranging set of conversations about the challenge of Sea Level Rise to the Bay Area, and San Mateo County specifically.  Supervisor Dave Pine brought together fellow elected officials (including Congresswoman Jackie Speier and Assemblyman Rich Gordon), scientists, agency heads, and other local leaders on the issue.

Here are some significant takeaways from the morning of talks.  You can learn more about the event and presenters here.


We need to start planning now:

Author and Oceanographer John Englander put it best in his talk, we know there will be at least 3 feet of sea level rise throughout the Bay.  We just don’t know – at least not precisely – whether it will take 20 years or 50 years for those projections to become reality.  With that in mind, there’s a strong argument for focusing not on the timeline, but on the level of protection needed to keep our shoreline communities safe, and keep the Bay healthy.  That means we need to start planning now; waiting for more accurate projections will only increase adaptation costs and put more of our shoreline at risk.


Different communities have different needs:

As a region, we’re all over the map.  Some counties have built right up to the shoreline, and are facing deep investments in what’s called “hard infrastructure” – the levees and other flood protection that we’re so used to seeing in New Orleans and elsewhere.  But other communities have significant restoration potential (particularly the South and North Bay), where salt ponds and former wetlands can provide incredible benefits to wildlife and communities by buffering against storm surges, which in turn means levees can be smaller and less costly.  There isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution; we will have to be creative in addressing the challenges of sea level rise.


Barriers exist, but none are insurmountable:

More than anything else, panelists (and local elected officials) showed that while there are countless barriers that need to be overcome in coming decades, none are insurmountable. And these barriers must be tackled from the local to the federal level.  Panelists from FEMA  discussed necessary changes to mapping and setting rates for flood insurance,  while the Army Corps of Engineers highlighted new challenges to designing and building much of the levee infrastructure. Both called on local pressure from elected officials and residents to change outdated thinking and plan for the future.  Locally, Supervisor Pine and Sam Schuchat, head of the California Coastal Conservancy, highlighted the opportunities presented by a regional funding strategy they are working on as members of the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority.


Adaptation to sea level rise will continue to be a complex issue  filled with significant challenges.  But events like this one in San Mateo are a strong first step in raising the profile of issues like sea level rise, and beginning conversations about how we’re going to address one of the greatest challenges of the coming century.